4.4 Article

Squamous Cellular Carcinoma Antigen Serum Determination as a Biomarker of Barrett Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer A Phase III Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 401-406

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000790

关键词

Barrett esophagus; tumor markers; biomarkers; SCCA; esophageal cancer

资金

  1. Xeptagen Spa, Marghera, Venice, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goal: To evaluate the potential role of the determination of the immunocomplexed form of squamous cell carcinoma antigen [SCCA-immunoglobulin (Ig)M] for the screening of Barrett esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Background: The cost-effectiveness of surveillance in BE is still debated and the use of biomarkers in screening and surveillance still not recommended. No information is available regarding SCCA-IgM determination in BE. Study: SCCA-IgM levels were determined (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in 231 patients prospectively recruited, 71 with BE, 53 with EAC, and 107 controls, including 42 blood donors and 65 patients with gastroesophageal reflux. SCCA-IgM cutoffs between BE/EAC and controls and for BE at risk versus short nondysplastic BE were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curves. Immunostaining for SCCA-IgM was obtained in a subgroup of patients. Results: Median SCCA-IgM values were significantly higher in BE and EAC than in controls (P = 0.0001). Patients with SCCA-IgM levels above the cutoff had a 33 times higher relative risk of harboring BE or EAC (P = 0.0001). Patients at risk, with long or dysplastic BE had SCCA-IgM levels significantly higher than those with short nondysplastic BE (P = 0.035) and patients with SCCA-IgM above the cutoff had a 8 times higher relative risk of having BE at risk. SCCA was expressed in Barrett mucosa but not in cardiac metaplasia. Conclusions: Serum SCCA-IgM determination allows the identification of patients at risk for BE/EAC and the stratification of BE patients in subgroups with different cancer risk. Because of the still limited number of controls, large, prospective studies are required to confirm this evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据