4.7 Article

A PDRMIP Multimodel Study on the Impacts of Regional Aerosol Forcings on Global and Regional Precipitation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 4429-4447

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0439.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council project NAPEX [229778]
  2. Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an, China
  3. Imperial College London
  4. Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K500872/1]
  6. UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI) [IND/CONT/E/93-14/697]
  7. supercomputer system of the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
  8. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [S-12-3]
  9. JSPS KAKENHI [15H01728, 15K12190]
  10. Norwegian Research Council [229771, 207711/E10, nn2345k, ns2345k]
  11. NERC [NE/K007483/1, NE/N006038/1]
  12. Natural Environment Research Council [1367954, 1228466] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate and black carbon (BC) generate inhomogeneous radiative forcing and can affect precipitation in distinct ways compared to greenhouse gases (GHGs). Their regional effects on the atmospheric energy budget and circulation can be important for understanding and predicting global and regional precipitation changes, which act on top of the background GHG- induced hydrological changes. Under the framework of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), multiple models were used for the first time to simulate the influence of regional (Asian and European) sulfate and BC forcing on global and regional precipitation. The results show that, as in the case of global aerosol forcing, the global fast precipitation response to regional aerosol forcing scales with global atmospheric absorption, and the slow precipitation response scales with global surface temperature response. Asian sulfate aerosols appear to be a stronger driver of global temperature and precipitation change compared to European aerosols, but when the responses are normalized by unit radiative forcing or by aerosol burden change, the picture reverses, with European aerosols being more efficient in driving global change. The global apparent hydrological sensitivities of these regional forcing experiments are again consistent with those for corresponding global aerosol forcings found in the literature. However, the regional responses and regional apparent hydrological sensitivities do not align with the corresponding global values. Through a holistic approach involving analysis of the energy budget combined with exploring changes in atmospheric dynamics, we provide a framework for explaining the global and regional precipitation responses to regional aerosol forcing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据