4.7 Article

Can Barents Sea Ice Decline in Spring Enhance Summer Hot Drought Events over Northeastern China?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 4705-4725

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0429.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0600701]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19070201]
  3. External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences [134111KYSB20150016]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41421004]
  5. CAS-PKU Joint Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In July-August (JA) of 2016, northeastern China (NEC) suffered from the most severe hot drought event of the past 50 years, leading to profound impacts on agriculture, the ecosystem, and society. Results indicate that the loss of sea ice over the Barents Sea (SICBS) in March might have influenced the hot drought events over NEC in JA for the period of 1997-2016. Further analyses reveal that lower SICBS is closely related to thinner snow depth over western Eurasia (SDWEA) in April. The decline of SDWEA leads to drier soil from the Yangtze River valley to northern China during May-June, which is favorable for precipitation deficiency over NEC in JA. Besides, the loss of SICBS in March and decline of SDWEA in April are closely related to the polar-Eurasia teleconnection pattern and dry soil over NEC in JA, which provides favorable atmospheric circulation patterns for occurrences of hot droughts. The large ensemble simulations from the Community Earth System Model and the numerical experiments based on version 4 of the Community Atmosphere Model further confirmed their connections and the associated possible physical processes. Therefore, snow depth and soil moisture might serve as linkages between Barents Sea ice in March and hot droughts over NEC during JA, and the Barents Sea ice in March might be an important potential predictor for the summer hot droughts over NEC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据