4.7 Article

Scenario analysis of urban GHG peak and mitigation co-benefits: A case study of Xiamen City, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 972-983

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.040

关键词

Urban GHG emissions; CO2 peak; Scenario analysis; Co-benefits; LEAP

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71573242, 71273252, 41371392]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2017J01468]
  3. Fujian Science and Technology Support Program for Provincial Universities [JK2015025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because cities are key to Chinese GHG management, a LEAP-based model integrating energy-related and non-energy related sectors was developed to study urban CO2 and GHG peak volume and time. Using Xiamen City as a case study, the future GHG emissions trends from 2015 to 2050 was simulated under three scenarios, namely a business-as-usual scenario (BAU), an emission-controlled scenario (EC), and a reinforced mitigation scenario (RM). Results show that Xiamen City will peak its total GHG emissions in 2039 under EC scenario and 2034 under RM scenario, while there might not be an obvious GHG peak under BAU scenario before 2050. Total CO2 emissions will peak at the same year as the GHG emissions peak year under EC and RM scenarios. Our research also indicates that population and economic growth has a significant impact on the city's CO2 and GHG peak, and Xiamen might reach the CO2 peak later than the national goal due to clean energy supply limitations and continued rapid growth. Lack of favorable conditions for large-scale renewable energy development and relatively high price of natural gas are the main obstacles for CO2 and GHG reduction in Xiamen City. In the future, greater attention on multi-sector reduction strategies is needed, including transforming industrial structure, expanding public transport while limiting private car growth, controlling per capita residential living area, improving public building energy efficiency, and reducing and reusing waste. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据