4.7 Article

Environmental impact analysis and process optimization of batteries based on life cycle assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 1262-1273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.059

关键词

Battery; Life cycle assessment; Process optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [41471461]
  2. National Key RD Plan [2017YFC0703100]
  3. Soft Science Research Fund of Shandong Province [2016RKE27001]
  4. Innovation Fund of Shandong University [IFYT1401, IFYT14010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an energy storage device, battery has been rapid developed in recent years with the typical environmental problems such as consumption of resources and heavy metal pollution. Therefore, it is urgent to conduct a comprehensive analysis and in-depth interpretation of the environmental impact of the battery industry to reduce environmental pollution. Life cycle assessment is applied to analyze and compare the environmental impact of lead acid battery (LAB), lithium manganese battery (LMB) and lithium iron phosphate battery (LIPB) within the system boundary of cradle-to-gate. The key processes and the key substances of environmental impact are identified by the traceability. The results showed that the overall impact of LIPB production on environment is the smallest. The key substances that cause the environmental impact of LAB production process are refined lead and tin. Lithium manganate and aluminum shell are the key substances that cause the environmental impact of lithium manganese oxide production process. The key substances that cause the environmental impact of lithium iron phosphate production process are lithium iron phosphate and aluminum shell. According to the position of each key substance in the process, the Reduce-Reuse-Recycle principle of circular economy theory is adopted to suggest the corresponding optimization. This research can provide useful reference for government decision-making and the sustainable development of battery industry. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据