4.7 Article

On optimization of thermal sensation satisfaction rate and energy efficiency of public rooms: A case study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 990-998

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.008

关键词

Building; Energy efficiency; Thermal comfort; Large public room

资金

  1. Science and Technology development fund (FDCT) of Macau [106/2016/A3, 078/2015/A3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For sustainability, many studies have been conducted on energy saving for HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning) systems. In a public place, different persons may have different thermal comfort requirements. Few studies are done so far for energy saving in a public place with HVAC systems that can accommodate many persons with thermal sensation differences for different persons being taken into account. In this work, during the summer from May to September in 2016, an investigation for energy saving is done in a large library room at Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China. In such a large room, the temperature in different areas is different and many students with different thermal sensations study in the room at the same time. Under such an environment, to save energy as well as maximize the total thermal satisfactory rate, a large number of experiments are carried out. Based on the collected data, methods are given to predict the indoor temperature for each reading area and thermal satisfactory rate under the current indoor temperature. Then, an efficient algorithm is developed to maximize the thermal satisfactory rate for the entire room by optimizing the input temperature of the ACC (air-conditioning control) system such that energy can be saved. Results show that, under the worst situation, by comparing with the manual control, the daily electricity saving is about 93 kWh and the electricity saving during the period from May to September is about 13,950 kWh. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据