4.7 Article

Major gas emissions from combustion of slurry fuels based on coal, coal waste, and coal derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 284-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.254

关键词

Coal; Coal processing waste; Filter cakes; Flammable liquid; Combustion; Gas emissions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research experimentally determines the major gas emissions from the industrial combustion of coal, coal processing waste, and coal derivatives in the form of traditional coal dust as well as slurry fuels with water and flammable additives. Several types of coal are considered: gas coal, flame coal, bituminous, non-coking and low-caking coal, as well as coal processing waste (filter cakes), coal derivatives (coke, semi-coke), and flammable liquids (industrial oil waste, fuel oil). Experimental data for charcoal and carbon dust from recycled car tires are presented as well. The concentration is evaluated for the most hazardous gas emissions: sulfur and nitrogen oxides. A number of factors defining the said concentrations are established: the quality of components, their elemental composition and concentration (40-60% coal, 30-50% water, 5-15% flammable liquid); slurry preparation method (homogenizer or cavitator); coal grind (8-250 mu m); and the mass of the batch (0.5-1.5 g). In particular, changing coal concentration in a slurry from 40 to 60% increases the emission of nitrogen oxide by 35% and sulfur oxide by 67%. Varying water concentration from 30 to 50% decreases the emission of nitrogen oxide by 17% and sulfur oxide by 62%. Increasing the flammable liquid concentration from 5 to 15% slightly lowers the emission of nitrogen oxide (by 5%), while the sulfur oxide emission grows by 28%. The advantages of coal-water slurry containing petrochemicals combustion are identified over coal. Moreover, the main limitations are determined for large-scale usage of slurry fuels instead of traditional heat and power industry fuels. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据