4.7 Article

Renewable energy consumption, economic growth and human development index in Pakistan: Evidence form simultaneous equation model

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 1081-1090

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.260

关键词

Renewable energy; Economic growth; Human development index (HDI); 2SLS; Pakistan

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [71625003]
  2. Yangtze River Distinguished Professor of MOE, National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602504]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91746208, 71573016, 71403021, 71521002, 71774014]
  4. Humanities and Social science Fund of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC630145]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620648]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major consumption of energy around the globe is related to human activities. However, it may be essential to quantify how renewable energy consumption influence process of human development. This particular area of research still needs to be explored. Thus, this paper explores the relationship between renewable energy consumption, economic growth and human development index for 1990-2014 in Pakistan by using Two-Stage Least Square (2SLS) method. Empirical results reveal that renewable energy consumption does not improve the situation of the human development process in Pakistan. More, interestingly higher the income of the country the lower is level of human development. In addition, the CO2 emission is helpful to improve human development index. Furthermore, trade openness discourages human development process in Pakistan. Furthermore, causality analysis confirms feedback hypothesis between environmental factor and human development process in the long run path. These novel findings would help policymaker and government officials to better understand the role of renewable energy and economic growth in the human development process in Pakistan. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据