4.7 Article

Evaluation of various cell drying and disruption techniques for sustainable metabolite extractions from microalgae grown in wastewater: A multivariate approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 634-643

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.098

关键词

Drying cell disruption; Metabolites extraction; Multivariate analysis; Oil production cost; Scenedesmus obliquus

资金

  1. National Research Foundation
  2. Durban University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study attempted to determine the yield of extractable metabolites and the cost of oil production from Scenedesmus obliquus cultivated in municipal wastewater. The microalgae achieved a biomass concentration of 1.64 g L-1 as well as pollutant removal efficiencies of 87.86% COD, 86.16% NH4+-N, and approximate to 100% PO43--P. The harvested microalgae were subjected to different drying and cell disruption techniques for lipid extraction, and the residual biomass was used to recover proteins and carbohydrates. Principal component analysis was employed to evaluate the metabolic yields obtained from sun-, freeze-, and oven-drying methods and microwave-, sonication-, autoclaving-, and osmotic shock-disruption techniques. The lipid yield varied between 4.90 +/- 0.42% for sun-dried biomass subjected to osmotic shock and 25.39 +/- 1.08% for freeze-drying with microwave-assisted extraction. Protein yield of the whole microalgae cells (31.26 +/- 3.76%) was comparable (p > 0.05) to that resulting from lipid-extracted micro algae by either autoclaving or osmotic shock. Carbohydrate yield of the intact microalgae cells (19.80 +/- 1.49%) was comparable (p > 0.05) to that of lipid-extracted microalgae from amongst all the cell disruption methods. Results of a techno-economic analysis indicated that the cost of oil production from microalgae varied between $0.883 and $2.088 per liter. These results revealed the feasibility of using a sequential extraction of lipids followed by proteins and carbohydrates. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据