4.7 Article

Do technological innovations promote urban green development?-A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 395-403

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.067

关键词

Technological innovation; Urban development; Eco-efficiency; Spatial autoregressive model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203013, 71333001]
  2. Beijing Key Lab of Sci-Tech Strategy Study for Urban Green Development [BNU160151101]
  3. Fundamental Research Fund for Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid urban economic growth in China has resulted in a number of resource and environmental challenges. Technological innovations are a source of economic growth but act as a double-edged sword in their effects on urban green development. This study aimed to determine whether technological innovations promote or impede the enhancement of urban eco-efficiency in China and also to reveal regional and administrative-level differences in terms of the effects of technological innovations. We selected the number of granted invention patents and the proportion of technology-related revenue in the total revenue of national high-technology industrial development zones (NHTIDZs) as indicators to represent knowledge innovation and product innovation, respectively, and used the spatial autoregressive model to examine the effects of the two innovations on urban eco-efficiency. The results showed that technological innovations, which enhanced urban eco-efficiency, had a greater impact on eastern cities than on central and western cities. The higher was the administrative level of a city, the greater were the effects of invention patents on urban eco-efficiency. Moreover, the higher was the administrative level of a city, the smaller was the role that NHTIDZs played in promoting urban eco-efficiency, which represented a case of diminishing marginal utility. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据