4.7 Article

Screening and cost assessment strategies for end-of-Pipe Zero Liquid Discharge systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 460-477

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.064

关键词

Zero Liquid Discharge; Brine; Optimization; Network design

资金

  1. University Research Board at the American University of Beirut [103187, 23308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zero Liquid Discharge refers to the elimination of wastewater discharge from a process. Many Zero Liquid Discharge systems are designed to meet the increasingly stringent environmental regulations and enable water recovery. Generally speaking, a Zero Liquid Discharge process must be capable of minimizing produced wastewater volumes, by employing effective water treatment options. It is often crucial to ensure that effective combinations of treatment technologies are used to assemble a Zero Liquid Discharge system, in an economically feasible manner. Even though various recommendations for enhancing treatment systems involve minimizing wastewater generation, which would reduce the volume of wastewater treated all the way to Zero Liquid Discharge, it is often costly to retrofit existing wastewater generating systems, especially if large brine flowrates are involved. As a result, numerous brine-generating processes (such as desalination plants, textile plants etc.) employ end-of-pipe Zero Liquid Discharge systems, to meet strict environmental discharge standards. This paper aims to identify effective design strategies for End-of-Pipe Zero Liquid Discharge systems, by proposing an optimization approach that allows the screening through various treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge technologies, so as to assemble cost-effective Zero Liquid Discharge strategies and enable suitable water recovery options. The proposed model has been illustrated using a case study that demonstrates how the generated Zero Liquid Discharge scheme changes by varying the End-of-Pipe discharge requirements. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据