4.7 Article

Optimizing xylose production from pinewood sawdust through dilute-phosphoric-acid hydrolysis by response surface methodology

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 572-579

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.039

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; Acid hydrolysis; Biorefinery; Waste valorization; Energy efficiency; Environmental benefit

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212205]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program of China [2015BAD15B06]
  3. Walt Disney Company (Shanghai) Limited
  4. Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science & Technology Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Response surface methodology was used to optimize the xylose production from pinewood sawdust through dilute-phosphoric-acid hydrolysis. The effects of independent variables on xylose yield were investigated, including reaction temperature (75-175 degrees C), reaction time (0-7.2 h), solution-to-feed ratio (4-20 mL/g), and phosphoric-acid concentration (0-6.67 wt%). Results indicated that the individual factor H3PO4 concentration and the interacting factors including temperature x time, temperature x H3PO4 concentration, and solution-to-feed ratio x H3PO4 concentration were all significant factors. Long reaction time (>5.4 h) and high phosphoric-acid concentration (>5%) showed little effect. Xylose yield increased with increasing temperature up to 125 degrees C. Higher phosphoric-acid concentration and larger solution-to-feed ratio also increased xylose yield. The coefficient of determination, corresponding analysis of variance, and parity plot indicated that the fitted model was appropriate for the acid hydrolysis process. The maximum xylose production of 90.95% could be obtained with the reaction temperature of 106.7 degrees C, reaction time of 4.57 h, phosphoric-acid concentration 4.49 wt%, and solution to-feed ratio of 12.51 mL/g. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据