期刊
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 1043-1053出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.146
关键词
Product service system; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; High energy-consuming equipment; Environmental burden
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775493, 71671180]
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province [LZ15E050003]
- Chinese Science and Technology Support Plan Project [2015BAF04B01-2]
- Green Manufacturing System Integration Project of Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information
- Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo ST Bureau [2017A610136]
Developing sustainable business models for high energy-consuming equipment (HECE) has attracted increasing attention. Product Service System (PSS) is one eminent candidate, in which assessing economic and environmental performance of PSS during the entire lifecycle of the equipment is of utmost importance. All the stakeholders should conclude their own benefits in advance. Yet, there is only few decision-making support tools for developing PSS of HECE, and the stakeholders can hardly apply them because of a lack of expertise. This paper articulates an evaluation tool which combines life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) to support the development of PSS for HECE. A framework is proposed to guide the evaluation procedure which consists of seven steps including goal and scope definition, system boundary determination, methods selection, scenarios construction, data collection, quantitative analysis and results interpretation. Air separation equipment (ASE), a typical HECE, is selected as a case study. The results show that extra economic benefits for both manufacturer and client are associated with increased investment, more environmental burdens and higher risk. Developing PSS might not always be a sustainable practice, e.g., gas supply service would lead to extra economic and environmental burdens due to frequent transportation. The suitable conditions for implementing different PSS modes are analysed and discussed. The case study demonstrates that the stakeholders can carry out LCA and LCC in a more efficient, convenient and comprehensive manner using our proposed evaluation tool. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据