4.7 Article

Water footprints of energy sources in China: Exploring options to improve water efficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 1021-1031

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.273

关键词

Water footprint; Energy; Electricity; Life cycle assessment; Water consumption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China key program Coupling mechanism and regulating approaches on human and natural interactions in urban complex ecosystem [71533005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge of water resource consumption and pollution during the life cycle of energy production and developing energy industry in regions with abundant water resources are two ways to improve water efficiency. In this study, a water footprint model for energy sources was developed, and water footprint inventories of the primary fossil fuels (e.g., coal, crude oil, natural gas) and power sources (e.g., thermal, nuclear, wind, solar photovoltaic, and hydropower) in China were compiled. The water footprints calculated for coal, crude oil, and natural gas were 0.14 m(3)/GJ, 0.29 m(3)/GJ, and 0.11 m(3)/GJ, respectively. The water footprints of power sources increased as follows: wind (0.14 m(3)/GJ), nuclear (0.19 m(3)/GJ), thermal (1.19 m(3)/GJ), solar (5.3 m(3)/GJ), and hydropower (6.75 m(3)/GJ). From a life cycle perspective, the water footprints of the three primary energy sources mainly originated from the extraction stages. The water footprint from upstream stages accounted for the highest proportion of the total water footprint of nuclear, wind, and solar power. Regional analyses revealed that provinces such as Sichuan, Yunnan, Hunan etc. have appropriate water resources and capacity for future development of energy system. A water footprint inventory of primary energy could provide basic data for water footprint analyses of secondary energy, materials, and products downstream across multiple sectors and could support water management in the energy industry. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据