4.7 Review

Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes - A comprehensive review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 1034-1043

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.240

关键词

Certification schemes; Sustainability; Literature review; Contingency analysis; Cross-sectoral

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01UT140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Voluntary sustainability certification schemes (CS) like the well-known Forest Stewardship Council are valuable approaches to address sustainability issues in different sectors. So far, a wide range of single topic studies exist but few emphasis has been put on analyses investigating factors considered responsible for shaping different dimensions of CS' success across different sectors and scientific disciplines. This study aims at closing this research gap by conducting a comprehensive systematic literature review of this growing body of research. Based on a database research, 226 records were selected to derive a framework explaining generic factors for the success of CS. To unveil broadly discussed factors and success dimensions within the literature, a contingency analysis was performed based on identified text passages. The relationship between specific factors and certain success dimensions is discussed comprehensively in the literature: The influence of the quality of the requirements and the capacity building measures on the problem solving capacity of CS as well as the influence of the characteristics of the adopting entities and to a lower degree governmental influences on the diffusion of CS are widely discussed. Moreover, the influence of the involvement of stakeholders and the transparency of the CS on the acceptance of CS is a main focus of analysis. A barely studied success dimension is the behavioral change towards more sustainable practices. These results enable and foster an interdisciplinary discussion on certification schemes which is necessary for understanding CS comprehensively and eventually driving practical improvements. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据