4.7 Article

An energy and carbon footprint assessment upon the usage of hemp-lime concrete and recycled-PET facades for office facilities in France and Italy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 1640-1653

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.111

关键词

Hemp-lime concrete; Recycled-PET; Gas emissions; Carbon footprint; Energy performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy efficiency and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions are actual key issues in all the economic sectors and, in particular, in buildings which is acknowledged worldwide as one of the most energy-consuming. In this context, it would be desirable to duly address those issues by searching for and assessing proper solutions and strategies: the usage of eco-friendly construction materials can be considered as one of those. This paper reports upon the performance of three facades containing sustainable products that are manufactured using natural resources and, alternatively, post-consumer waste based materials; those are: hemp-concrete; and Recycled PolyEthylene Terephthalate (R-PET), respectively. The energy performance of each facade was assessed in terms of cooling and heating demands, electrical consumptions and indoor thermal comfort including indoor temperature and relative humidity. Additionally, a Carbon Footprint (CF) assessment was carried out considering both the estimated energy demands and the life-cycle emission factors associated with the energy mix of the countries where the facades were located, i.e. France and Italy. Based upon the findings of the study, the R-PET facade represented the most performing solution between the three facades in all the scenarios considered and, moreover, the humidity-sensitive flow rate ventilation system came out as a solution able to reduce the electricity consumptions. Finally, considering the Carbon Footprint results, the energy country mix emerged as a key issue, making the Italian case study the worst one, though the total electrical energy consumption were comparable with those of the other case studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据