4.7 Article

Recovery of alkali and alumina from bauxite residue (red mud) and complete reuse of the treated residue

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 456-465

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.009

关键词

Bauxite residue; Calcification-carbonisation process; Alkali and alumina recovery; Complete reuse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1402271]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N162506003]
  3. National Key Laboratory Fund [yy2016006]
  4. Education Department of Liaoning Province Science and Technology Research Project [12014096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bauxite residue is an alkaline solid waste produced during the extraction of alumina from bauxite, which causes serious environmental problems and safety risks. In this study, alkali and alumina were recovered from Bayer bauxite residue using a novel calcification-carbonisation process. This produced a nonhazardous and near-neutral residue (C-C residue), the properties of which facilitated its subsequent reuse. After the calcification-carbonisation treatment, 46.5% of the alumina was extracted and the Na2O content in the final residue (C-C residue) dropped to less than 0.3%. In addition, the feasibility of using CC residue in the production of cement and the preparation of soil was analysed. The results showed that the chemical composition of C-C residue is very close to that of Portland cement clinker, which allows the dosage of bauxite residue in cement production to be increased. A comparison of the C-C residue with a general soil showed that the former performed well for many soil parameters, such as alkalinity and salinity, and has great potential for application in soil preparation. Thus, the calcification-carbonisation method, combined with cement production or soil preparation, is a sustainable process for completely reusing Bayer bauxite residue and facilitating bauxite waste minimisation. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据