4.7 Article

Enhanced removal of Cd(II) from water using sulfur-functionalized rice husk: Characterization, adsorptive performance and mechanism exploration

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 880-886

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.208

关键词

Rice husk; Xanthate; Sulfur containing; Cadmium; Biosorption

资金

  1. Special Fund for Environmental Protection Research in the Public Interest [20120948]
  2. HIT Environment and Ecology Innovation Special Funds [HSCJ201607]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By grafting sulfur-bearing groups onto rice husk with magnesium xanthate, a novel biosorbent (RH-M) was synthesized for removal of cadmium from water. New sulfur containing binding sites were achieved efficiently according to Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and elemental analysis, and the alternation of surface morphology of RH-M was presented by Scanning Electron Microscopy. The adsorption performance of xanthate-modified biosorbent including adsorbent dosage effect, pH-dependence, kinetic curves and equilibrium isotherms were systematically investigated. The Cd(II) adsorption of RH-M was found to follow Langmuir isotherm model with maximum adsorption capacity of 137.16 mg g(-1), significantly higher than that of many other reported adsorbents. The high-density sulfur-bearing groups on the functionalized rice husk surface are believed to improve the cadmium uptake due to a combination of ion exchange and chelation. Moreover, RH-M exhibited fast Cd(II) uptake ability in an exceptionally high correlation with pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Besides, Desorption experiments demonstrated that 0.5 M HNO3 solution could effectively desorb Cd(II) from the biosorbent with recovery rate up to 75% after four consecutive cycles. All these results recommend RH-M as a promising biosorbent for cadmium removal in aqueous solution. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据