4.5 Article

An effective methodology for simultaneous quantification of thiophanate-methyl, and its metabolite carbendazim in pear, using LC-MS/MS

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.07.010

关键词

Thiophanate-methyl; Metabolite; Carbendazim; Pear; LC-MS/MS

资金

  1. KYUNG NONG Co. Seoul, Republic of Korea [2016-1704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein we have developed an optimized analytical method for the simultaneous quantification of a fungicide, thiophanate-methyl, and its metabolite, carbendazim, in pear cultivated under open-field conditions using liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Due to the problem of partitioning associated with using acetonitrile and salts, methanol was used for sample extraction; the extract was then filtered using a vacuum filter, and cleaned-up using C-18 QuEChERS bulk sorbent following dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) procedure. Since a common problem, matrix effect, associated with the matrix was observed in LC-MS/MS, calibration curves for both thiophanate-methyl and carbendazim were constructed in the matrix using seven different concentration levels. Excellent linearity was observed, with determinant coefficient (R-2) >= 0.9990. The limits of quantification (LOQs) were <= 0.02 mg/kg, satisfactory in terms of the maximum residue limits. Methods were validated at two fortification concentrations (10 x LOQ and 50 x LOQ); the experiments were repeated three times for each level and the average recoveries were 75.00-84.92%, with the coefficient of variation (CV) being <= 5.78%. The developed analytical method was applied to pear samples previously sprayed with commercial thiophanate-methyl formulation four times on different days during preharvest treatment. The parent compound was converted to its metabolites and the total residues degraded continuously until harvest. The data obtained in this study could help set safety guidelines for thiophanate-methyl in pear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据