4.5 Article

Investigation of anti-Hepatitis C virus, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, in pure form, human plasma and human urine using micellar monolithic HPLC-UV method and application to pharmacokinetic study

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.04.011

关键词

HPLC-UV; Human urine; Human plasma; Dissolution test; Sofosbuvir; Daclatasvir

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous determination of sofosbuvir (SOF), and daclatasvir (DAC) in their dosage forms, human urine and human plasma using simple and rapid micellar high performance liquid chromatographic method coupled with UV detection (HPLC-UV) had been developed and validated. These drugs are described as co-administered for treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV is the cause of Hepatitis C and some cancers such as liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma) and lymphomas in humans. Separation and quantitation were carried out on an-onyx (TM) C-8 monolithic (100 x 4.6 mm (i.d.) analytical column maintained at 25 degrees C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1 M sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution containing 20% (V/V) n-propanolol and 0.3% (V/V) triethylamine and pH was adjusted to 6.5 using 0.02 M phosphoric acid, respectively. The retention times of SOF and DAC were 4.8 min, and 6.5 min, respectively. Measurements were made at flow rate of 0.5 mL/min with injection volume of 20 mu L and ultraviolet (UV) detection at 226 nm. Linearity of SOF and DAC was obtained over concentration ranges of 50-400, and 40-400 ng/mL, respectively in pure form, 60-300 and 50-300 ng/mL, respectively for human plasma and over 50-400, and 40-400 ng/mL, respectively for human urine with correlation coefficient > 0.999. The proposed method demonstrated excellent infra- and inter-day precision and accuracy. The suggested method was applied for determination of the drugs in pure, dosage form, and in real human plasma, real human urine and drug-dissolution test of their tablets. The obtained results have been statistically compared to reported method to give a conclusion that there is no significant differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据