4.6 Article

Metal-organic framework-derived three-dimensional porous graphitic octahedron carbon cages-encapsulated copper nanoparticles hybrids as highly efficient enrichment material for simultaneous determination of four fluoroquinolones

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1533, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.12.021

关键词

Cu@graphitic octahedron carbon cages; Pretreatment; Norfloxacin; Ciprofloxacin; Lomefloxacin; Enrofloxacin

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [NSFC51672116]
  2. Science and technology foundation of ocean and fisheries of Liaoning province [201408, 201406]
  3. General project of scientific research of the education department of Liaoning province [L2015206]
  4. Liaoning scientific instruments service sharing information platform ability construction funds [201507A003]
  5. Liaoning provincial department of education innovation team projects [LT2015012]
  6. foundation of 211 project for innovative talent training, Liaoning university

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique 3D porous Cu@graphitic octahedron carbon cages were constructed by rapid room-temperature synthesis of a Cu-based metal-organic framework (MOF) with further pyrolysis in N-2, which exhibited good enrichment ability for four fluoroquinolones (FQs) due to their superior chemical affinities to the target analytes. Applied Cu@graphitic octahedron carbon cages as adsorbent, a dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) method combined with HPLC was developed for detecting four FQs in real samples. Various parameters affecting residues FQs extraction efficiency were inquired in more detail. Under optimal conditions, the extraction recoveries of four FQs in chicken muscle, fish tissue, seawater and river water samples were in the range of 81.3 similar to 104.3% and the RSDs (n=5) were less than 5.2%. This method was successfully used to the determination of FQs in real samples. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据