4.6 Article

Melamine sponge decorated with copper sheets as a material with outstanding properties for microextraction of sulfonamides prior to their determination by high-performance liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1554, 期 -, 页码 28-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.04.015

关键词

Melamine sponge; Metallic copper sheets; Microextraction of sulfonamides; Milk; HPLC

资金

  1. General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT)
  2. Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the modification/loading of melamine sponge with metallic copper sheets (CuMeS) is discussed. The CuMeS is prepared in a fast, singe-step procedure, where concurrent production of copper oxides is avoided. The as-prepared CuMeS is utilized to develop a sensitive and selective sample preparation procedure to extract sulfonamides (SAs) from milk and water samples. The surface of the resulting CuMeS, after drying is rendered hydrophobic enabling hydrophobic interactions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the benefits of the high affinity of copper for SAs are reaped for analytical purposes. Due to the high selectivity, the proposed CuMeS-based procedure acts both as extraction and clean-up for the quantitative determination of SAs. The analytical method developed herein, which is based on the extractive potential of CuMeS, has the merits of wide linearity (including concentrations above and below the maximum residue limit of SAs), low limits of quantification (0.025-0.057 mu g L-1 for lake water and 0.23-1.05 mu g L-1 for milk samples), high enrichment factors and highly satisfactory recoveries and repeatability. The analytical method is validated according to the Commission Decision 657/2002/EC. Owing to the low cost of CuMeS and the straightforward procedure followed the proposed method can be applied to routine analysis of SAs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据