4.6 Article

Separation of enantiomers of chiral sulfoxides in high-performance liquid chromatography with cellulose-based chiral selectors using methanol and methanol-water mixtures as mobile phases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1557, 期 -, 页码 62-74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.05.002

关键词

Chiral sulfoxides; Separation of enantiomers; Enantiomer elution order; Polysaccharide-based chiral selectors

资金

  1. RNSF-CNR joint grants [04/02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interplay between structural details of chiral analytes and selectors in the separation of 14 chiral sulfoxides was systematically studied on 18 different polysaccharide-based chiral columns. Retention and enantioselectivity of a set of chiral sulfoxides were of primary interest. Several of chiral columns studied exhibited quite powerful chiral recognition ability in pure methanol. With addition of water to the mobile phase retention increased in the most cases and the separation factor improved. However, several exceptions were also noted. Of monosubstituted phenylcarbamates of cellulose as chiral selectors, chlorosubstituted ones did not show better enantiomer resolving ability compared to unsubstituted cellulose tris(phenylcarbamate). Out of disubstituted phenylcarbamates of cellulose the ones with methylsubstituents showed higher enantiomer resolving ability compared to chloro-substituted ones and substitution in positions 3 and 5 of the phenyl moiety was clearly advantageous. From disubstituted derivatives those possessing a combination of methyl- and chloro-substituents were advantageous compared to the ones having dimethyl- or dichloro-substituents. Interesting examples of reversal in enantiomer elution order (EEO) were observed on cellulose tris(4-chloro-3-methylphenylcarbamate)-and cellulose tris(3-chloro-4-methylphenylcarbamate)-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) function of the water content in the mobile phase. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据