4.5 Article

Hydrate anti-agglomeration and synergy effect in normal octane at varying water cuts and salt concentrations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 214-222

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2017.09.016

关键词

Methane hydrate; Anti-agglomeration; Salt; Span 80; Phase behaviour

资金

  1. Reservoir Engineering Research Institute (RERI)
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of the People's Republic of China (PRC) [16CX06028A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-agglomeration is a promising approach to address hydrate risks in oil and gas flowlines from the deep sea. Salt concentration of the coproduced water with hydrocarbons is known to affect anti-agglomeration. Most studies report improvement in efficiency of anti-agglomeration but some authors report a decrease from salts. In this work, the effect of water cut (ratio of aqueous phase to total liquid) and NaCl concentration on the effectiveness of the cocamidopropyl dimethylamine anti-agglomerant (AA) are investigated in normal octane and methane systems. We also investigate the synergic effect of a cosurfactant (Span 80) in improving the performance of the AA at water cuts of 10%-30%. A likely mechanism of the synergism is suggested: the co-surfactant (Span 80) promotes the dispersion of water droplets in the oil phase and the AA prevents the agglomeration of the hydrate particles. We investigate emulsion formation and the phase behaviour of octane/brine/AA/Span 80 emulsion to shed light on the mechanisms at play. A solid-like fluid which hardly moves under gravity is observed when the normal octane and water/brine and the anti-agglomerant are mixed at a water cut of 95%. The solid-like behaviour which is attributed to flocculation can be remedied by the introduction of alcohols in the solution. There are similarities in emulsion formation and hydrate anti-agglomeration of normal octane and a condensate liquid which was investigated recently and there are also major differences. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据