4.7 Article

Atomic Radius and Charge Parameter Uncertainty in Biomolecular Solvation Energy Calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 759-767

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00905

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific-Computing Research as part of the Collaboratory on Mathematics for Mesoscopic Modeling of Materials (CM4)
  2. NIH [GM069702]
  3. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomic radii and charges are two major parameters used in implicit solvent electrostatics and energy calculations. The optimization problem for charges and radii is underdetermined, leading to uncertainty in the values of these parameters and in the results of solvation energy calculations using these parameters. This paper presents a new method for quantifying this uncertainty in implicit solvation calculations of small molecules using surrogate models based on generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) expansions. There are relatively few atom types used to specify radii parameters in implicit solvation calculations; therefore, surrogate models for these low-dimensional spaces could be constructed using least-squares fitting. However, there are many more types of atomic charges; therefore, construction of surrogate models for the charge parameter space requires compressed sensing combined with an iterative rotation method to enhance problem sparsity. We demonstrate the application of the method by presenting results for the uncertainties in small molecule solvation energies based on these approaches. The method presented in this paper is a promising approach for efficiently quantifying uncertainty in a wide range of force field parametrization problems, including those beyond continuum solvation calculations. The intent of this study is to provide a way for developers of implicit solvent model parameter sets to understand the sensitivity of their target properties (solvation energy) on underlying choices for solute radius and charge parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据