4.5 Article

Enhancement of furfural-cyclopentanone aldol condensation using binary water-ethanol mixtures as solvent

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5522

关键词

biorefinery; cyclopentanone; furfural; solvent effects; drop-in diesel fuels; MgZr oxides

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry for Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTQ2014-52956-C3-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Cyclopentanone (CPO) - furfural (FFL) aldol condensation is a very interesting reaction for upgrading the furfural obtained in the depolymerization - dehydration reaction of cellulosic materials. Reaction is faster with cyclopentanone than with other ketones, and resulting condensation adducts are attractive for manufacturing drop-in fuels. However, the most important problem is that these adducts present low water solubility. RESULTS: Binary systems combining water (needed to promote aldol condensation) and ethanol (for enhancing the condensation adducts solubility) at different ratios have been tested. Operation parameters, such as water/ethanol ratio, temperature and reaction time, were optimized for this reaction. Best results (global yield to condensation adducts higher than 36%) were achieved using 1:2 water/ethanol ratio, and working at 303 K. Higher water ratios lead to the precipitation of condensation products, whereas higher ethanol concentrations hinder the catalyst performance. A reaction mechanism, considering a first-order kinetic model on cyclopentanone concentration, was proposed. Kinetic constants have been empirically correlated with ethanol concentration in the reaction medium. CONCLUSIONS: The use of binary ethanol-water binary mixtures with controlled solvent ratios can avoid the precipitation of condensation adducts. This precipitation leads to important operation problems in the reactor as well as to catalyst deactivation. The negative effect of the presence of ethanol on the reaction kinetics can be overcome by increasing reaction temperature. (C) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据