4.7 Article

NEAT1 upregulates TGF-1 to induce hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging hsa-mir-139-5p

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 11, 页码 8578-8587

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26524

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; hsa-mir-139-5p; NEAT1; TGF-1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573657]
  2. Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Care Key Project [2016146810]
  3. Experimental Animal Science and Technology Projects of Zhejiang Province [2017C37178, 2016C37101]
  4. High-level Talent Project of Lishui City [2014RC01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence has shown that the lncRNA Nuclear Enriched Abundant Transcript 1 (NEAT1) play important roles in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in various tumors. In our current study, we concentrated on the biological mechanisms of NEAT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. It was found that NEAT1 was significantly increased in human HCC cell lines including Hep3B, LM3, MHCC97L, SK-hep1, and HepG2 cells compared to the normal human liver cell line LO2. Meanwhile, we observed that hsa-miR-139-5p was greatly decreased in HCC cells, which suggested a negative correlation between NEAT1 and hsa-mir-139-5p. In addition, NEAT1 downregulation can restrain HCC cell growth, migration, and invasion. Consistently, overexpression of hsa-mir-139-5p exerted a similar phenomenon. Dual-luciferase reporter assay, RIP assay, and RNA pull-down assay confirmed that NEAT1 can function as a ceRNA by sponging hsa-mir-139-5p. In addition, TGF-1 was identified as a downstream target of hsa-mir-139-5p and hsa-mir-139-5p overexpression was able to suppress TGF-1 levels. Furthermore, it was indicated that TGF-1 inhibition can inhibit HCC cell growth, migration, and invasion ability. Taken these together, we speculated that NEAT1 can modulate TGF-1 expression by sponging hsa-mir-139-5p in HCC. These data indicates that targeting the NEAT1/hsa-mir-139-5p/TGF-1 axis could be a new strategy for HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据