4.7 Review

microRNA as a systemic intervention in the specific breast cancer subtypes with C-MYC impacts; introducing subtype-based appraisal tool

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 8, 页码 5655-5669

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26399

关键词

breast cancer; C-MYC; miRNA

资金

  1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences [1219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is indisputably a heterogeneous disease, in which a formidable combination of definitely dis-regulated C-MYC and microRNA (miRNA) profiles along with other factors are responsible to generate a specific type of breast cancer. C-MYC as a master regulator of more than 20,000 genes can modify the expression of genes underlying to perform diverse conflicting functional frameworks. The functional spectra of miRNA in the new areas of the evolution of cell behaviors are identified. Here, we endeavor to summarize some recent advances of miRNA applications that can be recruited as combinatorial targeted therapy for patients with breast cancer. Also, it is important to indicate that some exosomal miRNAs including miR-126, miR-122, miR-92-1, miR-19a, and miR-29c together with circular miRNAs, such as miR-21-5p, miR-96-5p, and miR-125b-5p can provide a promising evaluation route in breast cancer prognosis. Furthermore, miR-342, miR-520 for triple negative and hormone receptor-positive types of breast cancer, respectively in collaboration with two detected distinct cluster of miRNAs for different breast cancer cell lines can be applied for more dedicated miRNA-based individualized targeted therapy. New DNA handling capacity of C-MYC-related oncogenic miRNAs through coordination with exosomal miRNAs and circulatory ones can be a potential appraisal tool in breast cancer management. Given the notion that genomic instability is a hallmark of breast cancer, the different horizons that are provided in this review can be employed for more precise and profound analyses to achieve an evaluation signature for breast cancer subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据