4.6 Article

Increased circulation mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 119, 期 8, 页码 6575-6583

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26777

关键词

endothelial progenitor cell; infant; retinopathy of prematurity

资金

  1. Kermanshah University of Medical Science
  2. University of Tehran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a result of increased pathological neoangiogenesis of the retina in preterm infants. Cells responsible for the pathogenesis of ROP are unclear, but some evidence indicates that bone marrow derived cells are involved in this disorder. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), play a role in angiogenesis in response to tissue ischemia or endothelial damage. In this study, the number of cEPCs in preterm infants with ROP was determined to identify whether the circulation mobilization of EPCs is associated with ROP. We evaluated 99 participants in this study: 22 preterm infants with ROP, 35 preterm infants without ROP, and 42 full-term infants. The release of EPCs in the circulation was first quantified. Thereafter, cEPCs were harvested and cultivated, then the biological features of these cells including migratory, proliferative, and tubulogenic activities were analyzed. The mRNA levels of some proangiogenic factors were also measured in preterm infants. Our results showed greater numbers of cEPCs in infants with ROP, which was associated with increased serum concentrations of angiogenic factors and with augmented proliferative, migratory, and tubulogenic activity of these cells. Western blotting showed increased protein levels of VEGF and HIF- in cEPCs harvested from ROP infants. This study showed that ROP in preterm infants is associated with increased mobilization of EPCs into the circulation. Therefore, increased cEPCs along with elevated levels of angiogenic factors and tubulogenesis suggest that these cells may play a role in the development and progression of ROP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据