4.5 Article

A systematic survey of conformational states in β1 and β4 integrins using negative-stain electron microscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 131, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.216754

关键词

Laminin; Integrin; Electron microscopy; Conformational change

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT KAKENHI) [JP17H01420]
  2. Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research [Basis for Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)] - Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP17am0101075, JP17am0101072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural analyses of beta 2 and beta 3 integrins have revealed that they generally assume a compact bent conformation in the resting state and undergo a global conformational transition involving extension during upregulation of ligand affinity, collectively called the 'switchblade model'. This hypothesis, however, has not been extensively tested for other classes of integrins. We prepared a set of recombinant integrin ectodomain fragments including alpha v beta 3, alpha 2 beta 1, alpha 3 beta 1, alpha 5 beta 1, alpha 6 beta 1 and alpha 6 beta 4, and used negative-stain electron microscopy to examine their structures under various conditions. In contrast to av beta 3 integrin, which exhibited a severely bent conformation in low-affinity 5 mM Ca2+ conditions, all beta 1 integrin heterodimers displayed a mixed population of half-bent to fully extended conformations. Moreover, they did not undergo significant conformational change upon activation by Mn2+. Integrin alpha 6 beta 4 was even more resistant to conformational regulation, showing a completely extended structure regardless of the buffer conditions. These results suggest that the mechanisms of conformational regulation of integrins are more diverse and complex than previously thought, requiring more experimental scrutiny for each integrin subfamily member.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据