4.7 Article

Primary cilia sensitize endothelial cells to BMP and prevent excessive vascular regression

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 217, 期 5, 页码 1651-1665

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201706151

关键词

-

资金

  1. Britain Israel Research and Academic Exchange Partnership
  2. German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
  3. German Ministry of Education and Research
  4. European Research Council [311719]
  5. European Molecular Biology Organization [ALTF 2014-1625]
  6. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-14-CE12-0011, ANR-14-CE35-0022, ANR-16-CE14-0015-01]
  7. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L00030X/1]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE14-0015, ANR-14-CE35-0022] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  9. EPSRC [EP/L00030X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blood flow shapes vascular networks by orchestrating endothelial cell behavior and function. How endothelial cells read and interpret flow-derived signals is poorly understood. Here, we show that endothelial cells in the developing mouse retina form and use luminal primary cilia to stabilize vessel connections selectively in parts of the remodeling vascular plexus experiencing low and intermediate shear stress. Inducible genetic deletion of the essential cilia component intraflagellar transport protein 88 (IFT88) in endothelial cells caused premature and random vessel regression without affecting proliferation, cell cycle progression, or apoptosis. IFT88 mutant cells lacking primary cilia displayed reduced polarization against blood flow, selectively at low and intermediate flow levels, and have a stronger migratory behavior. Molecularly, we identify that primary cilia endow endothelial cells with strongly enhanced sensitivity to bone morphogenic protein 9 (BMP9), selectively under low flow. We propose that BMP9 signaling cooperates with the primary cilia at low flow to keep immature vessels open before high shear stress-mediated remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据