4.4 Article

hsa-miR-320d and hsa-miR-582, miRNA Biomarkers of Aortic Dissection, Regulate Apoptosis of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 275-282

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000568

关键词

aortic dissection; miRNA; apoptosis; VSMC

资金

  1. Key Program of Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai, China [201440024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) has been associated with aortic dissection (AD). Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs in aortic tissue samples between AD and nondiseased individuals. Selected miRNAs, which showed significant variation between the 2 groups, were then transfected into human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, and assessed for effects on cell migration and induced apoptosis. The changes in gene expression pattern in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells transfected with the miRNAs were also investigated. Among the 314 miRNAs detected in the aortic tissues from both AD and normal subjects, 46 showed significantly different expression patterns. Only 7 of these differentially expressed miRNAs were found to be enriched in AD, whereas the majority had diminished. hsa-miR-320d and hsa-miR-582 were 2 representative miRNAs that exhibited a decrease of greater than 10-fold. Transfection of hsa-miR-320d and hsa-miR-582 did not affect the migration capability of the vascular smooth muscle cells, but remarkably enhanced the staurosporine and tumor necrosis factor-a-induced apoptosis by 15% and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, the transfection of both miRNAs affected the expression of a vast multitude of genes, most of which were related to apoptotic pathways. The fluorescence reporter assays demonstrated that hsa-miR-320d and hsa-miR-582 bind the 3' UTR region of TRIAP1 and NET1 genes, respectively. These results suggest that hsa-miR-320d and hsa-miR-582 may serve as putative biomarkers for AD research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据