4.3 Article

A study on the impact of phosphate fertilizers on the radioactivity profile of cultivated soils in Srirangam (Tamil Nadu, India)

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2014.08.011

关键词

Phosphate fertilizers; Gamma ray spectrometry; Uranium activity; Srirangam taluk

资金

  1. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, Govt. of India, Mumbai [AERB/CSRP/45/05/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphate fertilizers are enriched with U-238 during its production from phosphate rocks. Since, application of phosphate fertilizers in modern agriculture is ever on the increase, the present study investigated the impact of phosphate fertilizers on the radioactivity profile of cultivated (fertilized) soils as against virgin soils. Thirty soil samples each from cultivated fields and virgin fields were collected from Srirangam taluk and analyzed for the activity concentrations of U-238, Th-232 and K-40 employing gamma ray spectrometry. Similar analysis was also undertaken in commonly used phosphate fertilizers. Among the phosphate fertilizers analyzed single super phosphate (396.3 Bq/kg) and triple super phosphate (284.2 Bq/kg) registered higher level of 238U. The mean activity level of 238U in cultivated soil (8.4 Bq/kg) was 25% higher than that of virgin soil (6.8 Bq/kg), while the mean 232Th and 40K activities in cultivated soil (98.4 Bq/kg & 436 Bq/kg) were elevated by 12.4% and 4% respectively as compared to virgin soil (87.5 Bq/kg & 419 Bq/kg). The mean radium equivalent (Raeq) value for virgin and cultivated soil samples was found to be 164.5 Bq/kg and 181.7 Bq/kg respectively. It is evident that the application of phosphate fertilizers elevated 238U level of the soil. However, the mean Raeq value for soil samples is well below the permissible limit of 370 Bq/kg and hence cultivated soils do not pose any radiological risk. Copyright (C) 2014, The Egyptian Society of Radiation Sciences and Applications. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据