4.5 Article

Age of the Lava Creek supereruption and magma chamber assembly at Yellowstone based on 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb dating of sanidine and zircon crystals

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 2508-2528

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GC005881

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The last supereruption from the Yellowstone Plateau formed Yellowstone caldera and ejected the >1000 km(3) of rhyolite that composes the Lava Creek Tuff. Tephra from the Lava Creek eruption is a key Quaternary chronostratigraphic marker, in particular for dating the deposition of mid Pleistocene glacial and pluvial deposits in western North America. To resolve the timing of eruption and crystallization history for the Lava Creek magma, we performed (1) 40Ar/39Ar dating of single sanidine crystals to delimit eruption age and (2) ion microprobe U-Pb and trace-element analyses of the crystal faces and interiors of single zircons to date the interval of zircon crystallization and characterize magmatic evolution. Sanidines from the two informal members composing Lava Creek Tuff yield a preferred 40Ar/39Ar isochron date of 631.3 +/- 4.3 ka. Crystal faces on zircons from both members yield a weighted mean Pb-206/U-238 date of 626.5 +/- 5.8 ka, and have trace element concentrations that vary with the eruptive stratigraphy. Zircon interiors yield a mean Pb-206/U-238 date of 659.8 +/- 5.5 ka, and reveal reverse and/or oscillatory zoning of trace element concentrations, with many crystals containing high U concentration cores that likely grew from highly evolved melt. The occurrence of distal Lava Creek tephra in stratigraphic sequences marking the Marine Isotope Stage 16-15 transition supports the apparent eruption age of similar to 631 ka. The combined results reveal that Lava Creek zircons record episodic heating, renewed crystallization, and an overall up-temperature evolution for Yellowstone's subvolcanic reservoir in the 10(3)-10(4) year interval before eruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据