4.4 Article

Enhanced chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells over silk fibroin/chitosan-chondroitin sulfate three dimensional scaffold in dynamic culture condition

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34074

关键词

silk fibroin; chitosan; chondroitin sulfate; mesenchymal stem cell; spinner flask

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India [BT/01/COE/09/13]
  2. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India [5-6/2013-TS VII]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chondroitin sulfate (Ch) is one of the main structural components of cartilage tissue, therefore, its presence in tissue engineered scaffold is expected to enhance cartilage regeneration. Previously, silk fibroin/chitosan (SF/CS) blend was proven to be a potential biomaterial for tissue development. In this study, the effect of Ch on physicochemical and biological properties of SF/CS blend was investigated and scaffolds with 0.8 wt% Ch was found to be favorable. The scaffolds possess pore size of 37-212 mu m, contact angle 46.2-50.3 degrees, showed controlled swelling and biodegradation. The biocompatibility of scaffold was confirmed by subcutaneous implantation in mouse. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) seeded scaffolds cultured under spinner flask bioreactor promoted cell attachment, proliferation, distribution, and metabolic activity in vitro. The histology and immunofluorescence studies revealed that combined effect of Ch and dynamic condition resulted in higher glycosaminoglycan secretion and native cartilage type matrix synthesis in comparison to SF/CS scaffolds used as control. Higher expression of collagen-II, Sox9, aggrecan and decrease in collagen-I expression represented by quantitative polymerase chain reaction study confirmed the progression of chondrogenic differentiation. This study successfully demonstrates the potentiality of SF/CS-Ch scaffold for hMSCs recruitment and redirecting cartilage tissue regeneration with enhanced chondrogenesis. (C) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据