4.4 Article

Constructing heparin-modified pancreatic decellularized scaffold to improve its re-endothelialization

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1063-1070

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0885328217752859

关键词

Heparin; pancreatic; decellularized scaffold; re-endothelialization; tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreas transplantation is considered as a promising therapeutic option with the potential to cure diabetes. However, efficacy of current clinical transplantation is limited by the donor organ. With regard to creating a functional pancreas-tissue equivalent for transplantation, vascularization remains a large obstacle. To enhance the angiogenic properties of pancreatic decellularized scaffold, surface modification of the vasculature was used to promote endothelialization efficiency. In this study, an endothelialized pancreatic decellularized scaffold was obtained through heparin modification under mild conditions. The immobilization of heparin was performed through 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide and N-Hydroxysuccinimide. The morphology, ultra-structure and porosity of the heparinized scaffold were characterized by toluidine blue staining, scanning electron microscope and infrared spectrum. The adhesion, proliferation and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells on heparin-pancreatic decellularized scaffold were also researched in vitro. In vivo transplantation was also performed to observe the location of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and the formation of new blood vessel, which exhibited significant differences with pancreatic decellularized scaffold group (p<0.05). These findings indicated that the endothelialized heparin-pancreatic decellularized scaffold may be used to solve the problem of blood supply and to support the function of insulin-secreting cells better after in vivo transplantation, and therefore, would be a potential candidate for pancreatic tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据