4.4 Article

Osseointegration mechanisms: a proteomic approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 459-470

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-018-1553-9

关键词

Osteogenesis; Bone regeneration; Coagulation; Osteoinduction; Biointerfaces

资金

  1. MINECO [MAT2017-86043-R]
  2. Universidad Jaume I [UJI-B2017-37, Predoc/2014/25]
  3. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) [UFI11/56]
  4. Basque Government [IT611-13, Predoc/2016/1/0141]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana [Grisolia/2014/016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prime objectives in the development of biomaterials for dental applications are to improve the quality of osseointegration and to short the time needed to achieve it. Design of implants nowadays involves changes in the surface characteristics to obtain a good cellular response. Incorporating osteoinductive elements is one way to achieve the best regeneration possible post-implantation. This study examined the osteointegrative potential of two distinct biomaterials: sandblasted acid-etched titanium and a silica sol-gel hybrid coating, 70% MTMOS-30% TEOS. In vitro, in vivo, and proteomic characterisations of the two materials were conducted. Enhanced expression levels of ALP and IL-6 in the MC3T3-E1 cells cultured with coated discs, suggest that growing cells on such surfaces may increase mineralisation levels. 70M30T-coated implants showed improved bone growth in vivo compared to uncoated titanium. Complete osseointegration was achieved on both. However, coated implants displayed osteoinductive properties, while uncoated implants demonstrated osteoconductive characteristics. Coagulation-related proteins attached predominantly to SAE-Ti surface. Surface properties of the material might drive the regenerative process of the affected tissue. Analysis of the proteins on the coated dental implant showed that few proteins specifically attached to its surface, possibly indicating that its osteoinductive properties depend on the silicon delivery from the implant. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据