4.6 Article

Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of a novel glycoside hydrolase family 113 β-1,4-mannanase from Amphibacillus xylanus

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 293, 期 30, 页码 11746-11757

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002363

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31630096]
  2. [T2014055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-1,4-Mannanase degrades beta-1,4-mannan polymers into manno-oligosaccharides with a low degree of polymerization. To date, only one glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 113 beta-1,4-mannanase, from Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius (AaManA), has been structurally characterized, and no complex structure of enzyme-manno-oligosaccharides from this family has been reported. Here, crystal structures of a GH family 113 beta-1,4-mannanase from Amphibacillus xylanus (AxMan113A) and its complexes with mannobiose, mannotriose, mannopentaose, and mannahexaose were solved. AxMan113A had higher affinity for -1 and -1 mannoses, which explains why the enzyme can hydrolyze mannobiose. At least six subsites -4 to +2) exist in the groove, but mannose units preferentially occupied subsites -4 to -1 because of steric hindrance formed by Lys-238 and Trp-239. Based on the structural information and bioinformatics, rational design was implemented to enhance hydrolysis activity. Enzyme activity of AxMan113A mutants V139C, N237W, K238A, and W239Y was improved by 93.7, 63.4, 112.9, and 36.4%, respectively, compared with the WT. In addition, previously unreported surface-binding sites were observed. Site-directed mutagenesis studies and kinetic data indicated that key residues near the surface sites play important roles in substrate binding and recognition. These first GH family 113 beta-1,4-mannanase-manno-oligosaccharide complex structures may be useful in further studying the catalytic mechanism ofGH family 113 members, and provide novel insight into protein engineering of GHs to improve their hydrolysis activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据