4.6 Article

B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) residues essential for Bcl-2′s apoptosis-inducing interaction with Nur77/Nor-1 orphan steroid receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 293, 期 13, 页码 4724-4734

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001101

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA66236]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis is mediated through the extrinsic or intrinsic pathway. Key regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway are the family of B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) proteins. The activity of the prototypical Bcl-2 protein is usually considered antiapoptotic. However, under some conditions, Bcl-2 associates with the orphan nuclear hormone receptors Nur77 and Nor-1, converting Bcl-2 into a proapoptotic molecule. Expression of Nur77 and Nor-1 is induced by a variety of signals, including those leading to apoptosis. Translocation of Nur77/Nor-1 to mitochondria results in their association with Bcl-2, exposing the Bcl-2 homology (BH) 3 domain and causing apoptosis. However, the molecular details of this interaction are incompletely understood. Here, through extensive Bcl-2 mutagenesis and functional assays, we identified residues within Bcl-2 that are essential for its interaction with Nur77/Nor-1. Although an initial report has suggested that an unstructured loop region between the Bcl-2 BH4 and BH3 domains is required for Bcl-2's interaction with Nur77/Nor-1, we found that it is dispensable for this interaction. Instead, we found important interacting residues at the BH4 domain and crucial interacting residues between the BH1 and BH2 domains. Bcl-2 alanine mutants at this region could no longer interact with Nur77/Nor-1 and could not initiate Nur77/Bcl-2-mediated cell death. However, they still retained their anti-apoptotic capability in two different death assays. These results establish crucial residues in Bcl-2 required for Nur77/Nor-1-mediated apoptosis and point to potential new strategies for manipulating Bcl-2 function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据