4.6 Article

Thermodynamic characterization of the multivalent interactions underlying rapid and selective translocation through the nuclear pore complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 293, 期 12, 页码 4555-4563

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.AC117.001649

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM112108, P41 GM109824, U01 GM098256, R01 GM117212, S10 OD016305, P30 CA013330, T32 GM007288-39]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA013330] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P41GM109824, R01GM112108, U01GM098256, T32GM007288, R01GM117212] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [S10OD016305] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) play important roles in many biological systems. Given the vast conformational space that IDPs can explore, the thermodynamics of the interactions with their partners is closely linked to their biological functions. Intrinsically disordered regions of Phe-Gly nucleoporins (FG Nups) that contain multiple phenylalanine-glycine repeats are of particular interest, as their interactions with transport factors (TFs) underlie the paradoxically rapid yet also highly selective transport of macromolecules mediated by the nuclear pore complex. Here, we used NMR and isothermal titration calorimetry to thermodynamically characterize these multivalent interactions. These analyses revealed that a combination of low per-FG motif affinity and the enthalpy-entropy balance prevents high-avidity interaction between FG Nups and TFs, whereas the large number of FG motifs promotes frequent FG-TF contacts, resulting in enhanced selectivity. Our thermodynamic model underlines the importance of functional disorder of FG Nups. It helps explain the rapid and selective translocation of TFs through the nuclear pore complex and further expands our understanding of the mechanisms of fuzzy interactions involving IDPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据