4.6 Article

Treatment Success Following Joint Arthroplasty: Defining Thresholds for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 2392-2397

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.062

关键词

arthroplasty; methodology; Oxford Hip Score; Oxford Knee Score; treatment success; thresholds

资金

  1. Stryker [RB0415]
  2. University of Innsbruck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patient-reported outcome scores are the mainstay method for quantifying success following arthroplasty. However, it is unclear when a successful outcome is achieved. We calculated threshold values for the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (OHS and OKS) representing achievement of a successful treatment at 12-month follow-up. Methods: Questionnaires were administered to patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty before and 12 months after surgery alongside questions assessing key aspects of treatment success. A composite success criterion was used to perform receiver operator characteristic analysis. Thresholds providing maximum sensitivity and specificity were determined for the total sample and subgroups defined by presurgery scores. Results: Data were available for 3203 THA and 2742 TKA patients. Applying the composite treatment success criterion, 67.3% of the TKA and 77.6% of the THA sample reported treatment success. Accuracy for predicting treatment success was high for the OHS and OKS (both areas under the curve, 0.87). For the OHS, a threshold value of 37.5 points showed highest sensitivity and specificity in the total sample, while for the OKS the optimal threshold was 32.5 points. Depending on presurgery scores, optimal thresholds varied between 32.5 and 38.5 for the OHS and 28.5 and 36.5 for the OKS. Conclusion: This is the first study to apply a composite success anchor to the OHS and OKS to evaluate outcome following total joint arthroplasty. Notably fewer patients report a successful outcome using a composite outcome threshold than report being satisfied. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据