4.6 Article

PCEC hydrogel used on sustained-release hyaluronic acid delivery with lubrication effect

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 135, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.46228

关键词

applications; biomaterials; friction; self-assembly; wear and lubrication

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475358]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Injection of bionic synovial fluid (BSF) is a conventional method to improve the lubricity of artificial joints, but BSF cannot maintain long due to the dilution and degradation of BSF in human body. To prolong the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid (HA), which is the major component of BSF, this study applies a temperature-sensitive poly(-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(-caprolactone) (PCEC) hydrogel loaded with HA to achieve long-term lubrication. In addition, Fourier transform infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance analysis, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and gel permeation chromatography spectra were used to analyze the structure of the synthetic hydrogel. Rheological test and test tube inverting method were used to characterize the thermosensitivity. The lubrication properties of the released solution were characterized by UV-vis, tribological tests, SEM, and 3D laser confocal scanning microscope. The experimental results reveal that the triblock PCEC hydrogel contains both hydrophilic block and hydrophobic block, and both PCEC and PCEC/HA hydrogels have phase-changed effect when the temperature increases from room temperature to body temperature. Moreover, the friction coefficient of the released solution from PCEC/HA hydrogel is approximatively 38% lower than that of phosphate buffer saline. And the ability of shear resistance and creep recovery of PCEC/HA hydrogel are better than that of PCEC hydrogel. This study provides an effective approach to achieve long-time lubrication effect for artificial joints. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46228.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据