4.5 Review

Diaphragm plasticity in aging and disease: therapies for muscle weakness go from strength to strength

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 2, 页码 243-253

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01059.2017

关键词

cachexia; critical illness; hypoxia; myosin heavy chain; sarcopenia

资金

  1. Physiological Society
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL-105355]
  3. Mayo Clinic
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-121500]
  5. Health Research Board (Ireland)
  6. Irish Research Council
  7. University College Dublin, Ireland
  8. University College Cork, Ireland
  9. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) [FIS 11/02029, FIS 14/00713]
  10. CIBERES, Spanish Respiratory Society (SEPAR) 2016
  11. Catalan Foundation of Pneumology (FUCAP) 2016
  12. Menarini SA (Spain)
  13. TAKEDA (Japan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diaphragm is the main inspiratory muscle and is required to be highly active throughout the life span. The diaphragm muscle must be able to produce and sustain various behaviors that range from ventilatory to nonventilatory such as those required for airway maintenance and clearance. Throughout the life span various circumstances and conditions may affect the ability of the diaphragm muscle to generate requisite forces, and in turn the diaphragm muscle may undergo significant weakness and dysfunction. For example, hypoxic stress, critical illness, cancer cachexia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and age-related sarcopenia all represent conditions in which significant diaphragm muscle dysfunction exits. This perspective review article presents several interesting topics involving diaphragm plasticity in aging and disease that were presented at the International Union of Physiological Sciences Conference in 2017. This review seeks to maximize the broad and collective research impact on diaphragm muscle dysfunction in the search for transformative treatment approaches to improve the diaphragm muscle health during aging and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据