4.6 Article

Thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, and dimensionless figure of merit (ZT) determination of thermoelectric materials by impedance spectroscopy up to 250°C

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 124, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5036937

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion under the Ramon y Cajal program [RYC-2013-13970]
  2. Universitat Jaume I [UJI-A2016-08]
  3. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K019767/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K019767/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impedance spectroscopy has been shown as a promising method to characterize thermoelectric (TE) materials and devices. In particular, the possibility to detemine the thermal conductivity lambda, electrical conductivity sigma, and the dimensionless figure of merit ZT of a TE element, if the Seebeck coefficient S is known, has been reported, although so far for a high-performance TE material (Bi2Te3) at room temperature. Here, we demonstrate the capability of this approach at temperatures up to 250 degrees C and for a material with modest TE properties. Moreover, we compare the results obtained with values from commercial equipment and quantify the precision and accuracy of the method. This is achieved by measuring the impedance response of a skutterudite material contacted by Cu contacts. The method shows excellent precision (random errors < 4.5% for all properties) and very good agreement with the results from commercial equipment (<4% for lambda, between 4% and 6% for sigma, and <8% for ZT), which proves its suitability to accurately characterize bulk TE materials. Especially, the capability to provide lambda with good accuracy represents a useful alternative to the laser flash method, which typically exhibits higher errors and requires the measurement of additional properties (density and specific heat), which are not necessarily needed to obtain the ZT. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据