4.5 Article

The Evolutionary Fate of Alternatively Spliced Homologous Exons after Gene Duplication

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1392-1403

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv076

关键词

alternative splicing; gene duplication; protein diversity; homologous exons; subfunctionalization

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [U41 HG007234]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competiveness [BIO2012-40205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternative splicing and gene duplication are the two main processes responsible for expanding protein functional diversity. Although gene duplication can generate new genes and alternative splicing can introduce variation through alternative gene products, the interplay between the two processes is complex and poorly understood. Here, we have carried out a study of the evolution of alternatively spliced exons after gene duplication to better understand the interaction between the two processes. We created a manually curated set of 97 human genes with mutually exclusively spliced homologous exons and analyzed the evolution of these exons across five distantly related vertebrates (lamprey, spotted gar, zebrafish, fugu, and coelacanth). Most of these exons had an ancient origin (more than 400 Ma). We found examples supporting two extreme evolutionary models for the behaviour of homologous axons after gene duplication. We observed 11 events in which gene duplication was accompanied by splice isoform separation, that is, each paralog specifically conserved just one distinct ancestral homologous exon. At other extreme, we identified genes inwhich thehomologousexonswerealways conserved withinparalogs, suggesting that thealternative splicingeventcannot easilybe separated from the function in these genes. Thatmanyhomologous exons fall in between these twoextremes highlights the diversity of biological systems and suggests that the subtle balance between alternative splicing and gene duplication is adjusted to the specific cellular context of each gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据