4.6 Article

Stress-induced magnetic properties of PLD-grown high-quality ultrathin YIG films

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 123, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5031198

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2015R1A2A1A10056286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yttrium iron garnet (YIG:Y3Fe5O12) thin films were grown on (111) gadolinium gallium garnet (Gd3Ga5O12, GGG) substrates using pulsed-laser deposition under several different deposition and annealing conditions. X-ray diffraction measurements revealed that the crystallographical orientation of the YIG films is pseudomorphic to and the same as that of the GGG substrate, with a slight rhombohedral distortion along the surface normal. Furthermore, X-ray reciprocal space mapping evidenced that in-situ annealed YIG films during film growth are under compressive strain, whereas ex-situ annealed films have two different regions under compressive and tensile strain. The saturation magnetization (4 pi M-S) of the films was found to vary, according to the deposition conditions, within the range of 1350 to 1740 G, with a very low coercivity of H-C < 5 Oe. From ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements, we estimated the effective saturation magnetization (4 pi M-eff) to be 1810 to 2530 G, which are larger than that of single crystalline bulk YIG (similar to 1750 G). Such high values of 4 pi M-eff are attributable to the negative anisotropy field (H-U) that increases in size with increasing compressive in-plane strain induced in YIG films. The damping constant (alpha G) of the grown YIG films was found to be quite sensitive to the strain employed. The lowest value of aG obtained was 2.8 X 10(-4) for the case of negligible strain. These results suggest a means of tailoring HU and aG in the grown YIG films by the engineering of strain for applications in spintronics and magneto-optical devices. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据