4.6 Article

Protective effect of sugars on storage stability of microwave freeze-dried and freeze-dried Lactobacillus paracasei F19

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 4, 页码 1128-1136

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13935

关键词

freeze drying; L; paracasei; microwave freeze drying; protectants; storage stability; sugars

资金

  1. German Ministry of Economics and Technology (AiF)
  2. FEI (Forschungskreis der Ernahrungsindustrie e.V., Bonn) [AiF 17477 N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsMicrowave freeze drying (MWFD) in comparison with conventional freeze drying allows for intensification of the preservation process of lactic acid bacteria without imposing additional processing stress. Viability as a function of storage time of microwave freeze-dried Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19 was investigated in comparison to conventionally lyophilized bacteria of the same strain. Furthermore, the impact of the protectants, sorbitol, trehalose and maltodextrin, on shelf life was analysed. Methods and ResultsThe highest inactivation rates of 0035 and 0045day(-1), respectively, were found for cultures without protectants. Thus, all additives were found to exhibit a protective effect during storage with inactivation rates between 0015 and 0040 day(-1). Although trehalose and maltodextrin samples were in the glassy state during storage, in contrast to samples containing sorbitol as protectant, the best protective effect could be found for sorbitol with the lowest inactivation rate of 0015 day(-1). ConclusionsDue to its low molecular weight, it might protect cells owing to better adsorption to the cytoplasma membrane. Sorbitol additionally shows antioxidative properties. Storage behaviour of microwave freeze-dried cultures follows the typical behaviour of a product dried by conventional lyophilization. No significant influence of the drying technique on storage behaviour was detected. Significance and Impact of the StudyGeneral findings concerning storage behaviour in freeze drying are likely to be applicable in MWFD with only slight adjustments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据