4.6 Article

Temporal variations in genotype distribution of human sapoviruses and Aichi virus 1 in wastewater in Southern Arizona, United States

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 124, 期 5, 页码 1324-1332

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13712

关键词

Aichi virus 1; gastroenteritis; genotyping; molecular epidemiology; PCR; sapovirus; sequencing; water

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Water and Environmental Technology (WET) Center
  2. Water Resources Research Center (WRRC), the University of Arizona
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  4. Fulbright Master of Science and Technology Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsTo investigate the molecular epidemiology, especially temporal variations in genotype distribution, of sapoviruses and Aichi virus 1 (AiV-1) in Arizona, United States, by examining wastewater. Methods and ResultsA total of 26 wastewater samples (13 influent and 13 effluent) were collected monthly from a wastewater treatment plant and viral strains were identified through nested reverse transcription-PCR followed by cloning and sequencing analysis. Identified sapovirus strains were classified into seven genotypes belonging to three genogroups (GI, GII, and GV): GI.1, GI.2, GI.3, GII.1, GII.2, GII.8 and GV.1, with a clear temporal shift. The majority of AiV-1 strains identified from the wastewater samples were classified into genotype B, and genotype A strains were identified in only two samples. ConclusionsWe identified a number of sapovirus and AiV-1 strains belonging to multiple genotypes in wastewater samples collected over a 13-month period. Our results suggested a temporal shift in prevalent genotypes in the community. Significance and Impact of the StudyThis is the first study elucidating the genotype distribution of human sapoviruses and AiV-1 in wastewater in the United States. Wastewater surveillance is especially useful for understanding molecular epidemiology of viruses that are less commonly tested in clinical diagnosis, including sapoviruses and AiV-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据