4.4 Article

Improvement of catalytic performance of AuAg/C catalysts prepared by galvanic displacement technique for glycerol electrooxidation in alkaline medium

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 317-328

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-018-1160-z

关键词

AuAg/C catalyst; Glycerol electrooxidation; Galvanic displacement; Bimetallic; Alkaline fuel cell

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  2. King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT) [TRG5880131]
  3. KMUTT through the KMUTT 55th Anniversary Commemoration Fund
  4. National Research University (NRU) Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity and stability of AuAg/C electrocatalysts prepared by a galvanic displacement between Au3+ and Ag on carbon were investigated. First, Ag/C was prepared by citrate reduction in alkaline and used as the displaced material. The addition of Au3+ into the Ag/C resulted in smaller fragments of AuAg nanoparticles. These AuAg/C catalysts were prepared at four Au loadings ranging from 5 to 30%wt Au. Upon interaction with glycerol, the catalyst surface became an Au-rich surface, thereby activating the catalysts. The promotion effects of Ag, such as negative shifts of both an onset potential and a potential at maximum current density, were observed on the catalysts with low Au content but not on those with high Au content. The AuAg/C catalysts with low Au content were more active than the Au/C one despite the very much larger size of the metal particles on the AuAg/C catalysts. The most active catalysts were 5%AuAg/C and 10%AuAg/C, providing much higher mass normalized current densities in electrolytes containing 0.1 and 1 M glycerol, respectively. The final current density of 10%AuAg/C after 60 min in 1 M glycerol electrolyte was 445 mA mg(Au) (-1), which was about 9 times higher than that of Au/C. A synergistic effect between Au and Ag improved the stability of the AuAg/C catalysts. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据