4.1 Article

Associations between TNF-alpha polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and vitiligo: a meta-analysis

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 5548-5559

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2015.May.25.6

关键词

Meta-analysis; Polymorphism; Rheumatoid arthritis; Tumor necrosis factor; Vitiligo

资金

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C2124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) promoter -238 A/G and -308 A/G polymorphisms are associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vitiligo susceptibility. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and a manual search were used to identify articles in which TNF-alpha polymorphisms were determined in RA or vitiligo patients and controls. Meta-analysis was used to examine the associations between the TNF-alpha -238 A/G polymorphism and RA and vitiligo using the allelic contrast and dominant models. Fifteen studies (10 RA and 5 vitiligo) involving 3678 cases and 4400 controls were considered. We observed an association between the TNF-alpha -238 A allele and RA when all subjects were considered [odds ratio (OR) = 0.686, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.476-0.968, P = 0.043]. After stratification by ethnicity, we found no association between the TNF-alpha -238 A allele and RA in European or Asian populations. We observed no association between the TNF-alpha -308 A allele and vitiligo (OR = 1.787, 95% CI = 0.894-3.573, P = 0.101). However, the adjusted OR by the trim-and-fill technique was significant (OR = 2.064, 95%CI = 1.138-3.743). After stratification by geographic continent, the TNF-alpha -308 A allele was significantly associated with vitiligo in Middle Eastern populations (OR = 1.569, 95%CI = 1.224-2.013, P = 3.8 x 10(-5)). The TNF-alpha -238 A/G polymorphism was associated with RA susceptibility, and the TNF-alpha -308 A/G polymorphism may be a significant risk factor for vitiligo in Middle Eastern populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据